Preface Table of Contents Abbreviations Introduction Chapter 1: Manuscripts and text tradition of the Nativitas 1.1. Manuscripts (David Juste)1.2. Text tradition (Carlos Steel) 1.2.1. Th e two traditions of the Nativitas 1.2.1.1. Errors in P V (and their copies Par L) against S 1.2.1.2. Errors in S against PV (and their copies) 1.2.1.3. Par a copy from V 1.2.1.4. P and L copies of a common model 1.2.1.5. Another witness of β: Munich, BSB, Clm 3857 1.2.1.6. Three copies of the introduction of the Nativitas 1.2.2. Two different versions of the revolution of the 35th year 1.2.2.1 Th e α version 1.2.2.2. Th e S version 1.2.2.3. Why are there two versions of the revolutions for the 35th year? 1.2.2.4. Is S a direct copy of Bate’s autograph? 1.2.3. Title 1.2.4. Conclusion: a short text history 1.2.5. Stemma codicum 1.3. Editorial principles (Carlos Steel) Chapter 2: A portrait of Henry Bate (Carlos Steel and Steven Vanden Broecke) 2.1. Introduction 2.2. Bate’s biography 2.2.1. Family background 2.2.2. Studies in Paris 2.2.3. Return to the Low Countries: courtly connections, astrology, and an ecclesiastical career 2.2.4. After the Nativitas 2.3. Bate’s self-portrait Chapter 3: Bate’s astrological and astronomical works (David Juste)3.1. Original works3.1.1. Magistralis compositio astrolabii (1274)3.1.2. [Equatorium planetarum] (date unknown) 3.1.3. Tables of Mechelen — Tabule Machlinienses (fi rst version before 1280) 3.1.4. Nativitas (1280-81) 3.1.5. De diebus creticis periodorumque causis (after 1281, perhaps 1292) 3.1.6. Commentary on Albumasar’s De magnis coniunctionibus (lost) [3.1.7.] †Tractatus in quo ostenduntur defectus tabularum Alfonsi 3.2. Translations3.2.1. Alkindi, Liber de iudiciis revolutionum annorum mundi (1278) 3.2.2. Abraham Avenezra, De mundo vel seculo I [Sefer ha-ʿolam I] (1281) 3.2.3. Abraham Avenezra, De luminaribus [Sefer ha-meʾorot] (1292) 3.2.4. Abraham Avenezra, Introductorius ad astronomiam [Reshit ḥokhmah] (1292) 3.2.5. Abraham Avenezra, Liber rationum I [Sefer ha-ṭeʿamim I] (1292) 3.2.6. Abraham Avenezra, Liber rationum II [Sefer ha-ṭeʿamim II] (1292) 3.2.7. Abraham Avenezra, Liber introductionis ad iudicia astrologie [Mishpeṭei ha-mazzalot] (1292) [3.2.8] †De fortitudine planetarum Chapter 4: Bate’s Nativitas: the earliest known astrological autobiography (Steven Vanden Broecke) 4.1. Purpose 4.2. ‘Autobiography’ and astrological meaning-making in the Nativitas 4.2.1. Astrological judgment and self-guidance 4.2.2. Particularity and notions of selfhood 4.2.3. The inhabitable birth chart 4.3. Precedents and reception 4.4. Structure and synopsis of the Nativitas Chapter 5: Bate’s Nativitas in context (David Juste) 5.1. The Nativitas in the history of astrology 5.2. Bate’s astrological sources5.3. Bate and the University of Paris 5.3.1. Introduction 5.3.2. Peter of Limoges 5.3.3. Other scholars and opportunities 5.3.4. William of Saint-Cloud 5.4. Appendix: Bate’s astrological sources Chapter 6: Bate and Abraham Ibn Ezra (Shlomo Sela)6.1. Introduction 6.2. The Triple Abraham 6.3. Abraham Avenezra 6.4. Abraham Princeps 6.5. Abraham Compilator Chapter 7: Basic elements of Bate’s astrological technique (Steven Vanden Broecke) 7.1. The four astrological charts of the Nativitas 7.2. Rectifying the nativity 7.3. Hyleg, alcochoden, and empirical verifi cation of the rectified nativity 7.4. A template for analysis: the twelve houses 7.5. Bate’s procedure of astrological self-analysis: the example of the first house7.5.1. Complexion and shape of the body 7.5.2. Qualities of the soul 7.5.2.1. Jupiter 7.5.2.2. Mercury 7.5.2.3. Interpreting the decans 7.6. Solar revolutions of the nativity Index of manuscripts Bibliography to the introductionNativitas Magistri Henrici Baten Conspectus siglorum Abbreviationes Textus Appendix i. Versio altera in codice Segoviensi 84 Appendix ii. Digressio in Libro Rationum Index fontium ab editoribus allegatorum Editiones et manuscripta fontium ab editoribus allegata

It would require an undue amount of space to list all of the aspects that make this edition of Bate’s Nativitasan arresting source for anyone interested in medieval intellectual and cultural history. Most importantly, perhaps, the book subtly undermines facile clichés about the nature of medieval astrology and in their place gives us a glimpse of the inner workings of the art, revealing an occasionally stunning degree of complexity and psychological depth.C. Philipp E. Nothaft, Journal for the History of Astronomy, Volume 50 Issue 2, May 2019, https://doi.org/10.1177/0021828619834390