A unique and fresh lens through which to view notions of early modern interiority ... Lee does an admirable job of coupling theory with practice in the final chapters and provides an interesting view of what we might call Hamlet's interior. The book is well researched and has far-reaching implications for those scholars interested in the controversies surrounding early modern subjectivity.

Sixteenth Century Journal

This is a well-argued book with relevance for the discussion of the proper approach to the self in contemporary criticism.

Years Work in English Studies

Thoughtful and wide-ranging ... This is a densely argued and quite demanding book which provides both a thorough survey of accounts of literary subjectivity and an original contribution to the discussion.

Modern Language Review

Se alle

Compelling study of Hamlet that adds substantially to our understanding of the play four centuries after its composition ... John Lee directly confronts the dominant critical paradigms of our time and points out that their shortcomings arise from a neglect of the text and a failure to consider adequately its context ... merit and will reward the careful attention of Shakespeare scholars.

Ben Jonson Journal

Carefully argued ... Lee's artfully constructed book is valuable for its account of the history and development of early and contemporary criticism, but it also has many penetrating comments on the play, going to the heart of some of its most irresolvable problems. If the Hamlet who emerges is a relatively familiar one, the processes which allow him to emerge in this way are meticulously and acutely examined.

H.R. Woudhuysen, Times Literary Supplement

This book offers a new approach to the discussion of English Renaissance literary subjectivity. Dissatisfied with much New Historicist and Cultural Materialistic criticism, it attempts to trace the history of the controversies of self. William Hazlitt emerges as a pioneering figure in a tradition of literary criticism which this book tries to advance. Drawing on the personal construct theory of George A. Kelly, and on the moral theory of Alasdair MacIntyre, the textual ways are traced by which 'That within' Hamlet is constructed. In an argument that challenges some of the founding propositions of New Historicist and Cultural Materialist practice, the Prince is seen to have a self-constituting, as opposed to a self-fashioning, sense of self. This sense of self is neither essentialist nor transhistorical; using the work of Charles Taylor , the play is seen to be exploring a Montaignesque, as opposed to Cartesian, notion of subjectivity. The controversies of self are, in fact, an issue within Shakespeare's play; and if the notion of Folio and Quarto Princes is allowed, it may even be at issue within the play. Hamlet debates our debate.
Les mer
An alternative discussion of English Renaissance literary subjectivity. Unhappy with New Historicist and Cultural Materialistic criticism, this study traces the history of the controversies of self. Hazlitt emerges as a pioneer in a tradition of literary criticism which this book tries to advance.
Les mer
Introduction ; 1 ; 2. Fear and Wonder ; 3. Something More than Fantasy ; 4. Fools of Nature ; 5. A Wave o' th' Sea ; 6. My Tables, My Tables ; 7. A King of Infinite Space ; 8. The Princes Hamlet ; Bibliography ; Index
Les mer
A unique and fresh lens through which to view notions of early modern interiority ... Lee does an admirable job of coupling theory with practice in the final chapters and provides an interesting view of what we might call Hamlet's interior. The book is well researched and has far-reaching implications for those scholars interested in the controversies surrounding early modern subjectivity.
Les mer
`carefully argued ... Lee's artfully constructed book is valuable for its account of the history and development of early and contemporary criticism, but it also has many penetrating comments on the play, going to the heart of some of its most irresolvable problems. If the Hamlet who emerges is a relatively familiar one, the processes which allow him to emerge in this way are meticulously and acutely examined.' H.R. Woudhuysen, TLS 12.01.01.
Les mer
Offers a new approach to the discussion of English Renaissance literary subjectivity, and a history of the controversies of self in which Hazlitt emerges as a vital spokesman. Draws on constructivist psychology and moral theory to challenge some of the founding propositions of New Historicism and Cultural Materialism. Reveals Prince Hamlet to have a self-constituting, as opposed to a self-fashioning, sense of self.
Les mer
John Lee is Lecturer in English, University of Bristol
Offers a new approach to the discussion of English Renaissance literary subjectivity, and a history of the controversies of self in which Hazlitt emerges as a vital spokesman. Draws on constructivist psychology and moral theory to challenge some of the founding propositions of New Historicism and Cultural Materialism. Reveals Prince Hamlet to have a self-constituting, as opposed to a self-fashioning, sense of self.
Les mer

Produktdetaljer

ISBN
9780198185048
Publisert
2000
Utgiver
Vendor
Oxford University Press
Vekt
535 gr
Høyde
241 mm
Bredde
163 mm
Dybde
19 mm
Aldersnivå
P, 06
Språk
Product language
Engelsk
Format
Product format
Innbundet
Antall sider
278

Forfatter

Om bidragsyterne

John Lee is Lecturer in English, University of Bristol