<p>"<strong>Concepts and comparisons go hand-in-hand. Beginning with Weber’s ideal types, which joined the general and the particular, comparative politics has grappled with the problem of delimiting the extension and intension of its language. This volume makes a significant contribution to this important discussion."</strong> —<em>Mark Lichbach, University of Maryland</em></p><p><strong>"This book breaks new ground, or re-opens old ground, in the field of description and concepts in the social science, which have been sorely neglected in the rush to measure everything. Politics is a particularly apt terrain for reviving the importance of conceptualization in research because it is the place where people are most likely to disagree about the words they use. Three cheers for taking concepts seriously again!"</strong>—<em>Bruce Gilley, Portland State University</em></p><p><strong>"Most ‘how-to-do-it’ manuals in political science pay little or no attention to the concepts being used in comparative research. This collection of essays fills the gap by exploring a wide range of topics in an equally wide variety of settings. I suspect that the volume as a whole will occupy a prominent place on the shelf of such manuals and that the editors’ introductory trilogy of the utility of concepts as ‘lenses,’ ‘building blocks’ and ‘scripts’ will become a valuable component of graduate and post-graduate training. "</strong>—<em>Philippe Schmitter, European University Institute</em></p>
Produktdetaljer
Om bidragsyterne
Anthony Petros Spanakos is an associate professor of political science and law at Montclair State University.
Francisco Panizza is Professor of Comparative and Latin American Politics at the London School of Economics and Political Science.