<p><i>"...he (Garth Fletcher) presents what he calls a realist account of scientific cognition that describes what good scientists really do. He then compares lay judgement with this model of science, and finds that "folk psychology is surprisingly scientific".</i><br />—<b><i>Contemporary Psychology.</i></b></p><p><i>"...the most wide-ranging discussion of folk psychology to appear...one of the most accessible, written in clear and graceful prose without unnecessary recourse to jargon. Fletcher succeeds in providing a useful introduction to issues on folk psychology and eliminativism that will be of interest to both philosophers and psychologists."</i><br />—<b><i>American Journal of Psychology</i></b></p><p><i>"This is a fascinating volume with much of importance to say about intuitive judgment, philosophy of science, and the many places where the two come together. It is closely reasoned, exhibits impressive scholarship, and perhaps best of all, is written in a clear and elegant style that is a pleasure to read. I both learned from and hugely enjoyed this book."</i><br />—<b>David C. Funder</b><br /><i>University of California, Riverside</i></p><p><i>"Garth Fletcher's <b>The Scientific Credibility of Folk Psychology</b> brings a refreshing breath of fresh air to current debates about the scientific status and merit of folk psychology, and is bound to have a very significant impact. In a short work that is totally devoid of philosophical dogmatism and ideology, Fletcher manages to disentangle and distinguish the various distinct but interrelated conceptual and theoretical issues that are too often confused and conflated by both philosophers and psychologists.<br />"Perhaps because Fletcher has no theoretical axe to grind, this ambitious work succeeds as no other in clarifying the conceptual contours of the present debate, as well as making its own significant contribution to it. Possibly the best work written to date on the subject, and one that will undoubtedly serve as a valuable resource for both philosophers and psychologists."</i><br />—<b>John D. Greenwood</b><br /><i>The City University of New York</i></p>