âLatour is the best scholar in the field with a huge range and fine grasp of<br />the literature. . . . Latour can also be a sparkling writer, exploiting his licence as a foreigner to write English with flair and adventure. . . . I admire [Chapter 3] not only because of its brilliance and fresh insights but also because of the courage it must have taken to write it.â - Harry Collins, <i>Metascience</i>
â. . . [B]oth thought provoking and potentially transformative. Latour lulls the reader into accompanying him on a quest to rethink objects as acting independently of our belief in them, and through this same belief. He also exemplifies this wonderful goal, proper to anthropology at its best: to displace common sense understanding and its objects, not deconstruct them.â - Julie Kleinman, <i>Anthropological Quarterly</i>
âLatour came into view in the 1980s as an uncommonly engaging as well as radical practitioner of the new discipline of science studies.... witty, imaginative, literate and unrelentingly ironic. For some, all this spells something manifestly frivolous and naturally suspect. Others, including many not ordinarily drawn to treatises on science and technology, are attracted by Latourâs style into engaging with ideas they find illuminating and a mode of analysis they can use.â - Barbara Herrnstein Smith,<i> London Review of Books</i>
"Eloquent, amusing and fabulously well-informed, Bruno Latour is one of the superstars of French intellectual lifeâŚ. His recent book <i>On the Modern Cult of the Factish Gods</i> shows that Latour remains a great star." - Jonathan RĂŠe, <i>New Humanist</i>
âBruno Latourâs is a joyous and generous science, not a warmongering, invidious one. His unique intellectual trajectory beautifully replicates those strange objects he was the first to fully discern. For his work is eminently suitable to an actor-network treatment; it thrives on associations; it deals in mediations; it articulates heterogeneous modes of existence; it modulates its own regime of enunciation as the truth it describes changes its own conditions of production. What started as a âsocial description of scientific practiceâ morphed into a radical redescription of the social at least as much as of science itself, and it bloomed as a daring project of a general anthropology of truth, within which facts and fetishes, divine forces and material forms, art and science, religion and law, all are made to inhabit a virtual plane of coexistence, which we are challengingly invited to bring into actuality as our common world.ââ<b>Eduardo Viveiros de Castro</b>, Museu Nacional (Rio de Janeiro)
âWhat immense spiritual and intellectual relaxation! With what vivacity and cunning Bruno Latour gets us out of the cage holding us hostage to the mumbo-jumbo of Subjects and Objects all these long years of Western Civ. Out-fetishizing these fetishes, nudging us toward the mastery of non-mastery, he invites us thereby to the sort of thinking needed to remake a failing world.ââ<b>Michael Taussig</b>, Columbia University
â[B]oth thought provoking and potentially transformative. Latour lulls the reader into accompanying him on a quest to rethink objects as acting independently of our belief in them, and through this same belief. He also exemplifies this wonderful goal, proper to anthropology at its best: to displace common sense understanding and its objects, not deconstruct them.â
- Julie Kleinman, Anthropological Quarterly
âLatour came into view in the 1980s as an uncommonly engaging as well as radical practitioner of the new discipline of science studies.... witty, imaginative, literate and unrelentingly ironic. For some, all this spells something manifestly frivolous and naturally suspect. Others, including many not ordinarily drawn to treatises on science and technology, are attracted by Latourâs style into engaging with ideas they find illuminating and a mode of analysis they can use.â
- Barbara Herrnstein Smith, London Review of Books
âLatour is the best scholar in the field with a huge range and fine grasp of<br />the literature. . . . Latour can also be a sparkling writer, exploiting his licence as a foreigner to write English with flair and adventure. . . . I admire [Chapter 3] not only because of its brilliance and fresh insights but also because of the courage it must have taken to write it.â
- Harry Collins, Metascience
"Eloquent, amusing and fabulously well-informed, Bruno Latour is one of the superstars of French intellectual lifeâŚ. His recent book <i>On the Modern Cult of the Factish Gods</i> shows that Latour remains a great star."
- Jonathan RĂŠe, New Humanist
Produktdetaljer
Om bidragsyterne
Bruno Latour is Professor and Dean for Research at Sciences Po in Paris. His many books include Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory; Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy; Pandoraâs Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies; Aramis, Or, The Love of Technology; and We Have Never Been Modern.