Before We Get StartedPart One: The Patients Chapter 1: Eleanor and the Case against Involuntary Hospitalization Chapter 2: Lily and the Case for Civil CommitmentPart Two: The Battleground Chapter 3: Those in Favor of Involuntary Treatments E. Fuller Torrey and the Treatment Advocacy Center Ronald Honberg and NAMI Paul Summergrad and the American Psychiatric Association Chapter 4: Those against Involuntary Treatments The Citizens Commission on Human Rights Cecelia Brown and Janet Foner and MindFreedom International Daniel Fisher and the National Empowerment Center Ira Burnim and the Bazelon CenterPart Three: Civil Rights Chapter 5: Eleanor and Lily and the Process of Civil Commitment Chapter 6: Christina Schumacher and the History of Civil Commitment LawsPart Four: Hospitalization Chapter 7: Officer Scott Davis and Law Enforcement Chapter 8: Dr. Leonard Skivorski and the Emergency Department Chapter 9: Eleanor’s Hospital Experience Chapter 10: Dr. Ray DePaulo and Inpatient Psychiatry at a University Hospital Chapter 11: Dr. Steven Sharfstein and Dr. Bruce Hershfield and Free-standing Psychiatric Hospitals Chapter 12: Dr. Annette Hanson and the Use of Seclusion and Restraint Chapter 13: Anthony Kelly and Involuntary Medications Chapter 14: Jim and Involuntary Electroconvulsive TherapyPart Five: Involuntary Outpatient Commitment Chapter 15: Marsha and Involuntary Outpatient Commitment Chapter 16: Outpatient Commitment by the Books Chapter 17: The Honorable Jack Lesser and Mental Health CourtsPart Six: A Danger to Self or to Others Chapter 18: Dan and Guns and Mental Illness Chapter 19: Bryan Stanley and Violence and Psychiatric Illness Chapter 20: Amy and Involuntary Treatment for Suicide Prevention Chapter 21: Will Forcing Treatment on People with Psychiatric Disorders Prevent Mass Murders?Part Seven: Future Directions Chapter 22: Transforming the BattlegroundReferencesAcknowledgments

Battle lines have been drawn over involuntary treatment. On one side are those who oppose involuntary psychiatric treatments under any condition. Activists who take up this cause often don’t acknowledge that psychiatric symptoms can render people dangerous to themselves or others, regardless of their civil rights. On the other side are groups pushing for increased use of involuntary treatment. These proponents are quick to point out that people with psychiatric illnesses often don’t recognize that they are ill, which (from their perspective) makes the discussion of civil rights moot. They may gloss over the sometimes dangerous side effects of psychiatric medications, and they often don’t admit that patients, even after their symptoms have abated, are sometimes unhappy that treatment was inflicted upon them.In Committed, psychiatrists Dinah Miller and Annette Hanson offer a thought-provoking and engaging account of the controversy surrounding involuntary psychiatric care in the United States. They bring the issue to life with first-hand accounts from patients, clinicians, advocates, and opponents. Looking at practices such as seclusion and restraint, involuntary medication, and involuntary electroconvulsive therapy—all within the context of civil rights—Miller and Hanson illuminate the personal consequences of these controversial practices through voices of people who have been helped by the treatment they had as well as those who have been traumatized by it.The authors explore the question of whether involuntary treatment has a role in preventing violence, suicide, and mass murder. They delve into the controversial use of court-ordered outpatient treatment at its best and at its worst. Finally, they examine innovative solutions—mental health court, crisis intervention training, and pretrial diversion—that are intended to expand access to care while diverting people who have serious mental illness out of the cycle of repeated hospitalization and incarceration. They also assess what psychiatry knows about the prediction of violence and the limitations of laws designed to protect the public."A highly informative and surprisingly balanced book that should be read by anyone with a personal or professional stake in how the mental health system provides care to those with chronic severe illnesses and those in acute crisis . . . Although Committed explores a complex subject, Miller and Hanson make a great effort to humanize this discussion."—Washington Post"Exceptionally intelligent, clear, readable and well researched."—Psychology Today"This fact-filled, open-minded, and straightforward survey will interest students of the subject and those serving mentally ill clients."—Library Journal"Committed is a very informative and thought-provoking book . . . Highly recommended. All readers."—Choice"A compelling, exceptionally well-researched and written analysis of the immensely complicated, multifaceted issues faced by families, physicians, psychiatrists, police, the courts and society when mental illness endangers patients and those around them."—Johns Hopkins Medicine"It is refreshing—indeed therapeutic—to encounter a thoughtful, balanced treatment of this contentious and important topic."—Psychiatric Times"This is quite a feat in 265 readable pages. I applaud the authors for their work."—Mad In America"I would recommend [Committed] to every clinician."—PsycCRITIQUE

A very well-written review of the current state of involuntary treatment for persons with mental illness in the United States.—Anita Smith Everett, MD, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, President-Elect of the American Psychiatric Association