This collection discusses appropriate methodologies for comparative research and applies this to the issue of trial transformation in the context of achieving justice in post-conflict societies. In developing arguments in relation to these problems, the authors use international sentencing and the question of victims' interests and expectations as a focus.

Chapter 1 Introduction: Rethinking International Criminal Justice?; Part I Achieving Justice in Post-Conflict Societies; Chapter 2 Mass Atrocity: Theories and Concepts of Accountability – On the Schizophrenia of Accountability, Caroline Fournet; Chapter 3 Collective Responsibility for Global Crime: Limitations with the Liability Paradigm, Mark Findlay; Chapter 4 Victims’ Expectations towards Justice in Post-Conflict Societies: A Bottom-Up Perspective, Ernesto Kiza, Holger-C. Rohne; Chapter 5 Making International Criminal Procedure Work: From Theory to Practice, Richard Vogler; Chapter 6 Should States Bear the Responsibility of Imposing Sanctions on its Citizens who as Witnesses Commit Crimes before the ICC?, Sylvia Ngane; Part II International Criminal Justice as Governance; Chapter 7 Exclusion and Inclusion: Bio-Politics and Global Governance through Criminalisation, Edwin Bikindo; Chapter 8 Contrasting Dynamics of Global Administrative Measures and International Criminal Courts: Cosmopolitanism, Multilateralism, State Interests, Nicholas Dorn; Chapter 9 Governing through Globalised Crime: Thoughts on the Transition from Terror, Mark Findlay; Chapter 10 Evaluating Sentencing as a Force for Achieving Justice in International Criminal Trials, Ralph Henham; Chapter 11 The Paradox of Global Terrorism and Community-Based Security Policing, Clive Walker;