1. Introduction: Normative and Empirical Perspectives on Predictive Sentencing Jan W de Keijser, Julian V Roberts and Jesper Ryberg 2. The Use of Risk Assessment in Sentencing Esther FJC van Ginneken 3. Why Legal Philosophers (Including Retributivists) Should Be Less Resistant to Risk-Based Sentencing Douglas Husak 4. Risk and Retribution: On the Possibility of Reconciling Considerations of Dangerousness and Desert Jesper Ryberg 5. Is Preventive Detention Morally Worse than Quarantine? Th omas Douglas 6. Against Incapacitative Punishment Zachary Hoskins 7. A Defence of Modern Risk-Based Sentencing 7 Christopher Slobogin 8. Some Dilemmas of Indeterminate Sentences: Risk and Uncertainty, Dignity and Hope Andrew Ashworth and Lucia Zedner 9. The Problematic Role of Prior Record Enhancements in Predictive Sentencing Julian V Roberts and Richard S Frase 10. Unpacking Sentencing Algorithms: Risk, Racial Accountability and Data Harms Kelly Hannah-Moff at and Kelly Struthers Montford 11. The Scientific Validity of Current Approaches to Violence and Criminal Risk Assessment Seena Fazel 12. Risk Assessment at Sentencing: The Pennsylvania Experience Rhys Hester 13. Predictive Sentencing: An Analysis of Public Views Jan W de Keijser and Sigrid GC van Wingerden 14. Sentencing and Prediction: Old Wine in Old Bottles Michael Tonry

The editors of this volume have assembled a distinguished group of scholars whose contributions incisively explore the many issues raised by predictive sentencing. The issues include its fit with standard views about the aims of legal punishment and with related moral concepts such as the rights and dignity of offenders. They also include the numerous complex and contested factors that go into making predictions about future offending, the accuracy of the resulting predictions, and the myriad uses to which they have been and might be put in sentencing. The volume is especially noteworthy for the range of disciplinary perspectives it contains, as well as for its well-informed and thoughtful analyses of the feasibility and defensibility of using predictions in sentencing.