Why do governments pass freedom of information laws? The symbolic power and force surrounding FOI makes it appealing as an electoral promise but hard to disengage from once in power. However, behind closed doors compromises and manoeuvres ensure that bold policies are seriously weakened before they reach the statute book.
The politics of freedom of information examines how Tony Blair's government proposed a radical FOI law only to back down in fear of what it would do. But FOI survived, in part due to the government's reluctance to be seen to reject a law that spoke of 'freedom', 'information' and 'rights'. After comparing the British experience with the difficult development of FOI in Australia, India and the United States – and the rather different cases of Ireland and New Zealand – the book concludes by looking at how the disruptive, dynamic and democratic effects of FOI laws continue to cause controversy once in operation.
1 FOI: hard to resist and hard to escape
2 From radical to inevitable: the development of FOI in Britain
3 New Labour, new openness?
4 The 1997 White Paper: a symbolic victory?
5 The 1999 draft Bill: the retreat becomes a rout
6 The Parliamentary passage: asymmetric warfare
7 FOI in the UK: survival and afterlife
8 The US, Australia and India: two firsts and the greatest?
9 Ireland and New Zealand: a legacy and an assault from within
10 FOI and the remaking of politics
Conclusion: why do governments pass FOI laws?
References
Index
'Freedom of Information. Three harmless words. You idiot. You naive, foolish, irresponsible nincompoop.'
Tony Blair, A Journey, 2010
The UK Freedom of Information Act has provoked controversy and praise, as well as expressions of regret in Tony Blair's memoirs. But why do governments pass laws that potentially expose them and threaten their power? And how do such laws survive the long and often controversial process of development?
The politics of freedom of information explores these questions through a detailed account of the implementation of freedom of information (FOI) in the UK. Looking beyond the simplistic narrative of 'secretive governments' resisting openness at all costs, it examines the nuances of the policy process and shows how a 'symbolic' policy can change before it is passed into law. After comparing the British experience with the difficult development of FOI in Australia, India and the United States - and the rather different cases of Ireland and New Zealand - it concludes by looking at how the disruptive, dynamic and democratic effects of FOI continue to cause controversy once in operation.
Based on interviews with key actors and experts, The politics of freedom of information offers unique insights into FOI laws - their perils, their appeal and the challenge of putting them into practice.