<p>'What emerges from this ‘little book’, is a concise but convincing account of the analytical<br />distinction between structural and epistemic discretion which is far more accessible than the work<br />of Alexy (2000) it is inspired by. Molander demonstrates the practical application of his arguments<br />when addressing concerns over accountability, providing an insight into how the distinction offers<br />more than simply a theoretical tool for examining tensions in the granting of discretion (i.e. with<br />the ‘rule of law’ or ‘democratic control’), but can also bear fruit when applied to the real-world<br />management of discretion decision-making in a welfare bureaucracy.'</p><p><strong>Jed Meers</strong> <em>York Law School, University of York, UK</em></p>
This book shows why the delegation of discretionary powers to professionals in the front-line of the welfare state is both unavoidable and problematic. It adds an epistemic dimension to the structural understanding of discretion, distinguishing between structural and epistemic measures of accountability.
Produktdetaljer
Om bidragsyterne
Anders Molander is Associate Professor at Centre for the Study of Professions, Oslo and Akershus University College, Norway.