These technical and often thorny legal issues have real practical significance to all who appear before international criminal tribunals. The author discusses them with her characteristically thorough analysis and rigourously methodical research. This book will be of interest to all those who appear before extant and future tribunals regardless of the process by which they came ot be established. It is also a significant contribution to the academic analysis of the struggle against impunity.
- James Mehigan, Australian International Law Journal, Volume 19
<p>J. Frank Dobie, the renowned Texan author, once wrote that the 'average PhD thesis is nothing but a transference of bones from one graveyard to another'. Dobie apparently viewed the majority of student theses as academic requirements, destined to collect dust in a campus repository...Thankfully, the theses drafted by Sarah Williams and Silvia D'Ascoli were not destined for such a fate, finding a saviour in Hart Publishing, which incorporated the texts into its <i>Studies in International and Comparative Criminal Law</i> Series.<br /><br />...both books contribute greatly to areas of international criminal law in need of further treatment [and] each should be proud to have contributed in a meaningful way to this emerging body of jurisprudence.<br /><br />Joint review of 'Hybrid and Internationalised Criminal Tribunals' by Sarah Williams and 'Sentencing in International Criminal Law' by Silvia D'Ascoli</p>
- Matthew Kane, International Affairs 88:5
<p>Sarah Williams' admirable book [is] a welcome and long overdue contribution to this field of scholarship.<br /><br />The breadth and heterogeneity of the subject-matter make her book a truly remarkable achievement and a must-read for anyone who wants to sudy hybrid and internationalised tribunals.</p>
- Patryk I. Labuda, Zeitschrift für Ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, Volume 74(2)
In recent years a number of criminal tribunals have been established to investigate, prosecute and try individuals accused of serious violations of international humanitarian law and international human rights law. These tribunals have been described as 'hybrid' or 'internationalised' tribunals as their structure and applicable law consist of both international and national elements. Six such tribunals are currently in operation: the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, the International Judges and Prosecutors Programme in Kosovo, the War Crimes Chamber for Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Iraqi High Tribunal and the Special Tribunal for Lebanon. The Special Panels for Serious Crimes in East Timor suspended operation in May 2005, although there continues to be some international involvement in investigation and prosecution of serious crimes. Suggestions have also been made that this model of tribunal would be appropriate for the prosecution of atrocities committed in, among others, Burundi, the Sudan, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Kenya and Liberia, as well as for a wider range of international crimes, most recently piracy.
The key aims of this book are: to place the model of hybrid and internationalised tribunals in the context of other mechanisms to try international crimes; to examine the increasing demand for the establishment of hybrid and internationalised judicial institutions and the factors driving such demand; to define the category of 'hybrid and internationalised tribunals' by examining the key features of the existing and proposed hybrid or internationalised tribunals, as well as the features of those institutions with international elements that are generally excluded from this category; to determine the legal and jurisdictional bases of existing hybrid and internationalised tribunals; to analyse how the legal and jurisdictional basis of a tribunal affects other issues, such as the applicable law, the application of amnesties and immunities and the relationship of the tribunal with the host state, third states, national courts and other international criminal tribunals. The book concentrates on the definitional, legal and jurisdictional aspects of hybrid and internationalised criminal tribunals as this has been the subject of some confusion in arguments before the tribunals and in the judgments of the tribunals. In its concluding section, the book examines the future role of internationalised and hybrid criminal tribunals, particularly in light of the establishment of the ICC, and the potential use of such tribunals in other contexts. It also assesses how hybrid and internationalised tribunals fit into a 'multi-layered framework' of international criminal law and transitional justice.
1 The Emerging System of International Criminal Justice
2 Hybrid and Internationalised Tribunals: A Study of Existing Practice
3 Exclusions and Proposals for Future Hybrid and Internationalised Tribunals
4 Hybrid and Internationalised Tribunals: In Search of a Definition
5 Legal and Jurisdictional Bases of Hybrid and Internationalised Tribunals
6 Legal Barriers to the Exercise of Jurisdiction
Studies in International and Comparative Criminal Law
Criminal law had long been regarded as the preserve of national legal systems, and comparative research in criminal law for a long time had something of an academic ivory tower quality. However, in the past 15 years it has been transformed into an increasingly, and moreover practically, relevant subject of study for international and comparative lawyers. This can be attributed to numerous factors, such as the establishment of ad hoc international criminal tribunals and the International Criminal Court, as well as to developments within the EU, the UN and other international organisations. There is a myriad of initiatives related to tackling terrorism, money laundering, organised crime, people trafficking and the drugs trade, and the international 'war' on terror. Criminal law is being used to address global or regional problems, often across the borders of fundamentally different legal systems, only one of which is the traditional divide between common and civil law approaches. It is therefore no longer solely a matter for domestic lawyers. The need exists for a global approach which encompasses comparative and international law.
Responding to this development this new series will include books on a wide range of topics, including studies of international law, EU law, the work of specific international tribunals, and comparative studies of national systems of criminal law. Given that the different systems to a large extent operate based on the idiosyncracies of the peoples and states that have created them, the series will also welcome pertinent historical, criminological and socio-legal research into these issues.
Editorial Committee:
Cheah Wui Ling (NUS, Singapore)
Caroline Fournet (Groningen, The Netherlands)
Rachel Killean, (QUB, Belfast)
Dawn Rothe (FAU, USA)
Liling Yue (Beijing, China)
Heike Jung (Saarbrücken, Germany)
Adel Ibrahim Maged (Cairo, Egypt)
Wolfgang Schomburg (Berlin, Germany)
Noha Aboueldahab (Brookings Institute, Doha)
Gleb I Bogush (HSE University, Russia)
Hector Olasolo (Universidad del Rosario, Colombia)
Leigh Swigart (Brandeis University, USA)
Sarah Williams (University of New South Wales, Australia)