James Meyer's Turks across Empires is a very valuable and intriguing reassessment of the origins of pan-Turkism through an in-depth examination of some of its leading figures ... a great pleasure to read ... Meyer's book is 'revisionist' in the sense that it successfully challenges many assumptions and arguments in the study of Russia's Muslims and pan-Turkism ... provides a more complete, flesh-and-bone biographical reconstruction of these intellectuals and their milieu ... the depiction of Kazan Tatars as 'insider Muslims' of Tsarist Russia is simply brilliant.

Turkish Review

[Turks Across Empires] presents a wealth of information drawn from archives, periodical publications, memoirs, and other documentary evidence in the languages needed for such a study: Ottoman, Russian, Tatar, and the Turkic of Azerbaijan ... As a result, Meyer's narrative fills in gaps and makes connections that nicely complement the steadily expanding literature on the late Ottoman/late Romanov period and the Turks who shaped their own and wider Turkic identities in that era. By extension, the identity question has profound implications for twentieth and even twenty-first century intellectual and political trajectories.

Review of Middle East Studies

Based on an impressive array of sources from Turkey, Russia, Ukraine, Georgia and Azerbaijan, James Meyer's monograph not only expands the knowledge about the Muslims of Russia but also provides a widely applicable argument about instrumentalization of identity in different political contexts.

Council for European Studies

James Meyer pursues an imaginative approach to the final decades of the Russian and Ottoman Empires by focusing on the biographies of three activists -- a Crimean Tatar, an Azerbaijani, and a Volga Tatar -- who, while born in Russia, were men with substantial interest and experience traveling to and living in the empire's southern neighbor. Biography becomes, thus, the modus operandi for unravelling the roles of these and similar men -- "trans-imperial people," as Meyer calls them -- in propagating pan-Turkism and suggesting it as a new identity for Turks, who were also overwhelmingly Muslim, everywhere.

Slavic Review

A major contribution of this work is its use of original source material in Turkish, Ottoman Turkish and Russian. Using personal correspondence and Ottoman and Russian tsarist era archives, Meyer traces four distinct periods to their trans-imperial existence moving back and forth between Istanbul, Kazan, Crimea, and Azerbaijan ... an important contribution in several ways.

Turkish Area Studies Review

impressive ... James Meyer's book is a collective biography of the most prominent pan-Turkists -- Yusuf Akçura (1876-1935), Ahmet Agğaogğlu (1869-1939), and Ismail Gasprinskii (1851-1914) -- by means of which the author reveals the patterns of migration from the Middle Volga, Southeast Caucasus, and Crimea to the Ottoman lands and back, as well as local politics in each protagonist's original region ... The fruit of this admirable exercise is most visible when Meyer demonstrates the simultaneous formation of population policy on both the Russian and Ottoman shores of the Black Sea.

Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History

Few Ottomanists understand the complexities of the situation of Muslims in the Russian Empire, while scholars of the Russian Empire have tended to imagine the Ottoman Empire only in broad brushstrokes. Meyer is one of a small new crop of scholars who possess the requisite skills ... The narrative is richly documented and thick -- perhaps the best account of VolgaUral public life in English

International Journal of Middle East Studies

The monograph of Meyer is a nice example of a study on borderland and cross-cultural interplay between Russia and Turkey.

Zaur Gasimov, Franz Steiner Verlag

path-breaking ... Meyer demonstrates brilliantly the shifts in articulation of cultural and political identities as well as change of the specific vocabulary in the written texts of the Turkic intellectuals.

Jahrbücher für Geschichte Osteuropas

Meyer, assistant professor of Islamic world history at Montana State University, draws from Turkish, Georgian, Azerbaijani, and Russian archives to bridge the gap between borderlands and peoples in this innovative study of the origins of pan-Turkism. Tautly argued and empirically grounded, the book highlights the diverse nature of identity formulation during the late imperial era, when the forces of modernity presented new challenges to traditional religious communities.

Canadian Slavonic Papers

the book does a very good job in bringing the complexities of Russia's Muslim intellectual life of the late imperial period close to a readership broadly interested in the modernization of Russia's peripheries and in Russian-Ottoman relations ... Meyer convincingly demonstrates that since the 1870s Muslim communities in inner Russia perceived the state as a threat, especially in view of the administrative attempts at taking control over Muslim schools.

Journal of World History