Beal's study of a largely ignored eighteenth-century pronouncing dictionary is an important contribution to the field of English historical phonology largely through the benefits of its inclusive methodology: the technique leaves no relevant evidential stone unturned and the results are consequently firmly fixed in their historical, social and linguistic framework.
Margaret J-M Sonmez, J. Linguistics 36 (2000).
a work that contains a number of new insights into sound change at the phonetic level, and into the interrelationship between phonic details, their social conditioning and their phonological implications. / From the smaller world of Thomas Spence's life and works to the larger context of language studies then and now, this is a book that makes connections.
Margaret J-M Sonmez, J. Linguistics 36 (2000).
careful piecing together of evidence from many sources.
Margaret J-M Sonmez, J. Linguistics 36 (2000).
the whole of [this] final section is essential reading for any student of Early and Later Modern English pronunciation.
Margaret J-M Sonmez, J. Linguistics 36 (2000).
a tantalising glimpse of what can happen when evidence relating to phonetic and lexical diffusion is combined.
Margaret J-M Sonmez, J. Linguistics 36 (2000).
Beal's work has a far wider significance than its subtitle might suggest, and the book is an important work of scholarship in eighteenth-century English phonology and in the history of English phonology more generally.
Margaret J-M Sonmez, J. Linguistics 36 (2000).
Beal has done us a great favour in drawing Spence's work to our attention, and another in regulating and evaluating its content.
Alison Wray, Journal of Sociolinguistics
this book may be seen as a valuable addition to a rather underesearched period of the English Language
Alison Wray, Journal of Sociolinguistics