each chapter can stand alone, contributing an argument or position to a specific question related to modeling, and offering insight into specific instances of modeling through the case studies ... The examples in the book can provide meaningful considerations then for those looking to understand modeling in context, which may be the best way to understand how contemporary science is engaged in the practice of reconstructing reality.
Melissa Jacquart, Science and Education
In sum, Morrison's new book is a rich and provocative contribution to several core debates in current philosophy of science such as explanations and understanding, idealizations, models, and computer simulations. Even if one is not convinced by all of the points that Morrison makes in (what we call) a 'particularist' and 'therapeutic' style, one thing is for sure: if one wants to defend a 'general philosophical account' of some of the discussed topics, then one has to respond to the criticisms forcefully presented in Reconstructing Reality.
Alexander Reutlinger and Stephan Hartmann, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
Morrison's look at concrete and intricate cases of modeling raises a number of interesting issues, and at places, her piecemeal approach is as refreshing as her claims are thought-provoking. The book thus is a valuable reading for philosophers who work on modeling in physics.
Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews Online
Her limpid exposition and copious use of example in the interpretation of the function of models in different investigative contexts is an essential contribution to the current debate about the role of reconstructive methods in the practice of science ... Highly recommended.
L. C. Archie, CHOICE