John Foster presents a penetrating investigation into the question: what is it to perceive a physical object? Is perceptual contact with a physical object, he asks, something fundamental, or does it break down into further factors? If the latter, what are these factors, and how do they combine to secure the contact?
For most of the book, Foster addressed these questions in the framework of a realist view of the physical world. But the arguments which thereby unfold - arguments which undermine direct realism and establish a version of the sense-datum theory - lead to the conclusion that we do no perceive physical objects at all. The only way to avoid this conclusion is by abandoning physical realism for a form of idealism, and this is the option which Foster finally embraces.
The Nature of Perception makes an important contrbution to the ongoing debate: it sheds fresh light on the traditional issues, and breathes new life into positions which most current philosophers assume to be dead.
Les mer
Presents an investigation into the following questions: What is it to perceive a physical object? Is perceptual contact with a physical object something fundamental, or does it break down into further factors? If the latter, what are these factors, and how do they combine to secure the contact?
Les mer
1. The Reshaping of the Issue ; 2. An Examination of Strong Direct Realism ; 3. The Mediating Psychological State ; 4. The Problem of Perception ; 5. The Idealist Solution ; Bibliography; Index
`Review from previous edition Penetrating and thoughtful study ... Foster's arguments are powerful and deep.'
Times Literary Supplement
`A lucid, powerful, beautifully structured book.'
Mind
A major work from a widely admired philosopher
Incisive exploration of what it is to perceive
A controversial challenge to dominant views about mind and world
John Foster was Fellow and Tutor in Philosophy at Brasenose College, Oxford, from 1966 to 2009.
A major work from a widely admired philosopher
Incisive exploration of what it is to perceive
A controversial challenge to dominant views about mind and world