'Daniel M. Brinks's The Judicial Response to Police Killings in Latin America represents an important contribution to the growing literature on the rule of law in nascent democracies. … Brinks's skillful use of in-depth case studies is impressive. … Brinks argues convincingly that any legal system is a reflection of deeply rooted social hierarchies. … Brinks's innovative use of the notion of 'legal tolls' is particularly compelling. … Brinks's book is a welcome contribution to our understanding of the impact of social marginalisation on the rule of law. … The book's scope makes it a valuable addition to the scholarship on the rule of law not only in Latin American but across the developing world.' The Review of Politics

' … an innovative study that draws on both socio-legal studies and comparative politics and combines quantitative and qualitative analysis. It represents a highly significant contribution to the growing body of literature on democracy and the rule of law in Latin America.' Journal of Latin American Studies

This book documents the corrosive effect of social exclusion on democracy and the rule of law. It shows how marginalization prevents citizens from effectively engaging even the best legal systems, how politics creeps into prosecutorial and judicial decision making, and how institutional change is often nullified by enduring contextual factors. It also shows how some institutional arrangements can overcome these impediments. The argument is based on extensive field work and original data on the investigation and prosecution of more than 500 police homicides in five legal systems in Argentina, Brazil, and Uruguay. It includes both qualitative analyses of individual violations and prosecutions and quantitative analyses of broad patterns within and across jurisdictions. The book offers a structured comparison of police, prosecutorial, and judicial institutions in each location, and shows that analyses of any one of these organizations in isolation misses many of the essential dynamics that underlie an effective system of justice.
Read more
1. Effectiveness and inequality in the legal system; 2. Charting injustice in Argentina, Brazil, and Uruguay; 3. Informational and normative shifts across jurisdictions; 4. Buenos Aires - political interference and informational dependence; 5. Sao Paolo - normative autonomy and informational failures; 6. Uruguay - strong results from a weak system; 7. Cordoba - high levels of inequality in a strong system; 8. Salvador da Bahia - social cleansing under political and judicial indifference; 9. Binding leviathan.
Read more
This book examines the effect of social inequality, political influence and institutional design on the effectiveness of Latin American legal systems.

Product details

ISBN
9780521872348
Published
2007-10-22
Publisher
Cambridge University Press; Cambridge University Press
Weight
610 gr
Height
240 mm
Width
161 mm
Thickness
23 mm
Age
P, 06
Language
Product language
Engelsk
Format
Product format
Innbundet
Number of pages
302

Biographical note

Daniel M. Brinks is assistant professor of government at the University of Texas at Austin, teaching comparative politics and public law, with an emphasis on politics and democracy in Latin America. He holds a Ph.D. in political science from the University of Notre Dame and a J.D., cum laude, from the University of Michigan Law School. Professor Brinks's research has appeared in journals such as Comparative Politics, Studies in Comparative International Development, Comparative Political Studies, and the Texas International Law Journal. Among his many awards and accolades, Brinks has received Honorable Mention in the Gabriel Almond Competition for Best Dissertation in Comparative Politics (2006), the Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies Visiting Fellowship (2006-07), Eli J. and Helen Shaheen Notre Dame Graduate School Award in the Social Sciences (2004), the American Bar Foundation Doctoral Fellowship (2002-04), the Social Science Research Council International Dissertation Research Fellowship (2000-01), and a Fulbright Fellowship (2000-01, declined).